*cough* Bullshit *cough*

My initial response is —

You say you can meet the needs of his IEP?

Prove it.

So I am formally requesting an IEP Team Meeting.  Still working on my response to Miss Pearson, but if she believes me comforted or placated by her letter, she is sadly mistaken.

Part of me understands her position.

The School Board made a decision some years ago to not increase funding from the general education budget to the Special Education Budget.  They can not reduce funding, IDEA provides that a school district must continue to supply the at least the same funding from GenEd funds one year as they did the previous.  However, the moneys from the federal government and Oregon Department of Education only cover a small percentage of the total budget (I believe it is around 20%).  GenEd funding into SpecialEd is at the same dollar amount as 5-10 years ago.  It has not been adjusted up even for inflation or for changes in the number of special education students, for example, so the special education department has been forced to operate with a relatively smaller portion of the overall budget each year.

Add to that, PPS has received sanctions from ODE for the 3rd time since 2009; requiring them to spend 1.5M$ to correct unequal discipline applied to African-American SPED students.

I get that they have very limited resources; I hate feeling like fighting for what my child needs to be successful is taking away from another child and what that child needs.

Maybe its time to go after the school board.

Response from PPS (Mary Pearson, Senior Director, Special Education) 10/3/14

*I have included my comments, italicized, in brackets*

Dear Ms. R* [she misspelled my name],

I am responding to your email of October 1, 2014. I understand that you are upset with a district decision to move a para-educator from Stephenson to another school in the district.  It is always difficult to lose a valued member of the school community, and I understand that this para had a special relationship with StudentM. I want to assure you that we will continue to implement your child’s IEP, along with the IEPs of other students at Stephenson. 

[can’t wait to find out how she can “assure” that]

In PPS, para-educators are not assigned like other district staff based on school enrollment or numbers of students on IEPs. Paras are assigned primarily to assist with students who have the most intensive support needs – students who need physical management, toileting, or individualized delegated heath care, and who could not be safe at school without the additional adult support. On occasion paras do get assigned to assist with other students and situations, but we have to prioritize safety first.  Over the next month, additional adjustments will be made across the district as projected needs from last spring are compared to current needs now.

[She informs me of her policy regarding para-educator support as if whatever she decided can trump federal law.  She can declare that only students of Korean descent with missing pinky toes get para-educator support.  That doesn’t make it legal.]

The Special Education Department thoroughly reviewed the IEPs of all students at Stephenson before making this decision. Jeff Brown, our special education Program Administrator for the Wilson/Cleveland cluster, spent several hours observing classrooms and reviewing schedules and IEPS. Based on all of this data, the decision was made that the students’ needs could be met without the additional para support.  Our goal for all students is to move toward increased independence, and all agree that StudentM has made great strides in this direction. The special education team and teachers at Stephenson will continue to work with StudentM to provide the adult assistance identified on his IEP.  We will continue to assess and respond to needs that arise.

[“thoroughly reviewed the IEP of all Students at Stephenson.”  Jeff Brown did not talk to the special education teacher.  I would be surprised if he looked at a single IEP. 

spent several hours observing classrooms and reviewing schedules and IEPS”  I was THERE while he “observed” the kindergarten classroom.  He was there for less than 15 minutes; he left the room twice.  Aside from that, I don’t believe that he looked up from his computer once.  He was observing during teacher instruction while students were seated on a rug in a group, and not during class work or transitions, nor while the student in question had any demands made of him other than to sit. 

Jeff Brown did request the AmazingParaEducators schedule, but it only tells a partial story; he should know that.  AmazingParaEducator’s schedule is somewhat flexible.  She is assigned an hour with my child, and the next with another child, but mine is prioritized, so if her professional judgment leads her to continue to work with my son, she does so. In one two week period, my son was out of the classroom 30% of the time; far above the 10% allotted by his IEP.  Jeff Brown does not know this, because he didn’t bother to request that data.  I’m sure it’s because it didn’t matter.  He was going to pull AmazingParaEducator, no matter what.]

We agree with you that the abrupt timing of this decision is not ideal. The Stephenson team will work with StudentM to help him adjust to the change. Extra support is also available from NL, the school psychologist assigned to Stephenson. We have asked PPS School Psychologist NL to check in with StudentM and his teachers frequently over the next few weeks to identify any concerns and help problem-solve.

[I LOVE this one.  School Psychologist has always been available; she is not some new support.  Additionally, she is only at our school ONE DAY a week.  I’m sure that it will be very helpful to have her check in frequently each Monday, and that she will really be able to see patterns and be proactive in warding off destructive behaviors!

We appreciate your advocacy on StudentM’s behalf.

Sincerely,

Sincerely,

Mary Pearson, Senior Director,  Special Education

Jeff Brown, PPS Special Education Program Administrator

Second Letter to PPS SPED 10/2/14

You should have received an email from me yesterday expressing my concerns regarding a decision to remove the para-educator AmazingParaEducator from Stephenson Elementary. I have yet to receive any response, not even an acknowledgement of receipt. I would prefer to allow further time for your response, however, this is a time sensitive issue. It is my understanding that Miss AmazingParaEducator will be handing in her key and issuing her good-byes this afternoon; an event which will precipitate the inevitable meltdown of my child and an immediate increase in danger to others around him, as well as the impending decline in my child’s ability to receive an acceptable education.

I have considered the options available to me should common sense fail to prevail and the decision to remove Miss AmazingParaEducator stands as is.

  1. Passing this e-mail distribution list to a wider audience of parents at Stephenson. Families of special needs children receiving attention from AmazingParaEducator, as well as parents of neurotypical children in classrooms with AmazingParaEducator’s former charges are invested in this decision; I have already received numerous requests from others for this information as they wish to dispute this decision as well. Between the fact that our school is small, our community exceptionally involved, and my familiarity with so many families after 5 years serving on our PTA board; many voices will be added to my own.
  2. Filing form 581-1337-E Request for Complaint Investigation with the Oregon Department of Education.
  3. Contacting the Department of Human Services. In addition to qualifying for a case worker due to autism, StudentM also has a case manager due to his status as a child adopted from foster care.
  4. Following up with FACT and ORPARC for additional support and advocacy.
  5. Contacting Diane Wiscarson from Wiscarson Law
  6. Appealing to the public by forwarding my concerns to every local news outlet regarding the apparent lack of concern that Portland Public Schools fosters towards its special needs children. If I am forced to resort to this, I will be recruiting additional families affected by this callous attitude in a variety of ways so far this year (closing contained classrooms, SPED bus service unavailable at the start of the year, SPED bus riders on the bus for far longer than 45 minutes due to lack of behavior support on the bus, and so on). I am involved with a number of support groups for families of autism in the Portland area; sadly, there are no shortage of these stories.

 

Thank You,

Kristen R*

*email removed*

*phone # removed*

First Letter to SPED @ PPS

It has come to my attention that a decision was made to abruptly remove the para-educator AmazingParaEducator from Stephenson Elementary school. My child, StudentM, fifth grade, is one of the students she assisted daily. I find this decision to be ill-made and to the strong detriment to my child, and I urge you to reconsider. His IEP will not be satisfied without her presence and interventions; I do not believe that my child can receive an appropriate education as protected by law without her aid.

Additionally, it is also emotionally harmful; StudentM has a bond with Miss AmazingParaEducator, as this is the fourth year that she has been assisting him. AmazingParaEducator has developed an amazing rapport with StudentM, and while AmazingParaEducator maintains a professional demeanor, she obviously cares about him, and their relationship is one of very few that he can maintain without the stress that comes with most social interaction for my child.

I do not understand how a few hours of observation, wherein you see Miss AmazingParaEducator’s students actually functioning well, leads to “What a waste of money, we need to move her” instead of “Wow, Miss AmazingParaEducator is clearly doing an amazing job; look how well these students with diverse special needs and complicated IEPs are doing with her assistance! We clearly got a steal when we hired her!”

StudentM is on the Autism spectrum, diagnosed with Asperger’s Syndrome (ASD), and Sensory Integration Disorder. I hope that you are aware of the primary “deficits” associated with Asperger’s, which include Executive Dysfunction and Theory of Mind.

Executive Dysfunction. StudentM does not have the ability to easily master executive function tasks which includes skills such as organizing, planning, sequencing, sustaining attention, making mid-course corrections, keeping track of time or multiple activities at once, knowing when to seek help or additional information and inhibiting inappropriate responses.

In time, the Asperger’s brain may learn to handle these tasks, but it comes much later than the neurotypical child. StudentM is in NO WAY developmentally ready to master these skills. AmazingParaEducator has been functioning as StudentM’s executive function. Her schedule permits her to assist StudentM at *critical* times during the day to set him up for success. She helps him insure that he has the necessary materials to complete a lesson, confirms that he understands the instruction, and then steps back to let him work independently as much as possible, but is available to step in if StudentM is struggling beyond what is typical of his fellow students.   AmazingParaEducator aids StudentM, too, at the end of each day, again bridging the executive function gap, reminding him of the steps that he needs to take – recording the day’s homework, packing his backpack with the correct materials that correspond with that homework, making note of documents that we need to print at home (We supply a laptop for his use at school as writing is a stressor), and so on.

Nor can AmazingParaEducator just teach him the steps to prepare and then expect that StudentM can continue to operate independently. He is unable to generalize – unable to apply knowledge learned in one setting to another similar, but not exactly the same, situation. Without her guidance, he will spend half the lesson time finding a pencil, ruler, the correct spiral notebook, and so on. Considering that Asperger’s already = half the work in twice the time, it is unreasonable to expect he will be able to complete the work or learn the concepts expected of him.

Please note that these are not motherly vaporings; these facts are supported by the BRIEF exam administered by PPS Psychologist NL in the Spring of 2014.

Communication. (Theory of Mind) StudentM demonstrates typical issues with communication that you would expect to see with ASD. He has difficulty “reading between the lines,” figurative language, understanding abstract concepts like sarcasm, or interpreting facial expressions. He has trouble explaining his behavior, and understanding how his behavior impacts how others think and feel.

His inability to communicate effectively is especially challenging because of his further diagnoses – Sensory Integration Disorder.   StudentM is unable to process sensory input in an expected manner. Auditory stimuli are the most obviously a challenge for him, and the most omnipresent in the school setting, but he also has difficulty with visually “noisy” environments (such as a classroom, walls covered in anchor charts, resources and student work), as well as tactile issues (both avoidance and seeking).

Just being in the school setting is painful. Imagine sitting on a cushion on sandpaper, wearing the tightest, uncomfortable, itchiest wool sweater while someone behind you is incessantly humming “It’s a Small World” and you might come close to understanding how he feels in the room with the ambient noise of 30 students, the walls “shouting” multiplication tables at him. This is a stress that builds and builds, and if he does not receive a break from the sensory input, he will have a meltdown that hurts not only his day but the days of the children around him. And he has very little skill in communicating that feeling to those around him. Pre-diagnosis, pre-accommodations, and pre-AmazingParaEducator, StudentM was violently aggressive nearly every afternoon.

AmazingParaEducator is able to cut through all of that. She has a remarkable understanding of his unique way of expressing himself, interpreting his body language, hearing his words, and synthesizing that into what he is actually trying to say. Her ability to truly hear him has deepened his trust and AmazingParaEducator is able to guide StudentM into performing tasks that no one else has been able to do, including myself. She is expert at reading StudentM and negotiating him into his quiet space as provided in his IEP in order to decompress and relieve some of the sensory stress. After three years of AmazingParaEducator implementing a five point scale system with StudentM, he has improved his ability to communicate this distress, but is still unlikely to approach anyone with that information unless he knows the person well.

AmazingParaEducator is also the vehicle through which regularly scheduled breaks from noise are implemented. StudentM does not have lunch in the cafeteria. Because AmazingParaEducator is available to supervise, even when our special education teacher, PF, is unavailable due to other duties, the resource room has been opened to StudentM at lunch time so that he can eat in a low light, quiet setting. The immediate difference once this accommodation was made was beyond belief. It provides enough time for StudentM to “re-set” and he is able to make it through the remainder of the day without daily aggressive outbursts. This accommodation is provided through his IEP. Stephenson is a small school; there are simply not enough warm bodies without AmazingParaEducator to allow for lunch supervision outside the cafeteria on a daily basis.

Because of his sensory processing disorder, StudentM is excused (via his IEP) from other activities, such as music, that will do more harm than good. Currently AmazingParaEducator is scheduled to spend that time with StudentM. This not only provides the relief from the noise, but gives the opportunity for AmazingParaEducator to assist him with unfinished class work, or to help him understand a concept which has eluded his mastery. In the absence of any of those things, they use the time to work on uncompleted homework, inspiring my everlasting gratitude. It is next to impossible to complete homework at home, as his black and white thinking has relegated that type of work to the school environment; homework time is a battle because you simply can not force an individual with Asperger’s to do something that they don’t want to do.

I would like to add that even if none of these things were true, and my child were suddenly able to operate completely independently, receiving an appropriate and acceptable education without a 1:1 para-educator, removing such an important part of his support structure at school with such abruptness alone is likely to cause challenges. As per the report from PPS Psychologist NL after testing last spring, his profile indicates “significant rigidity combined with emotional dysregulation. Children with this profile have a tendency to lose emotional control when their routines […] are challenged and/or flexibility is required”. I have worked with Ms. Fahey in creating a plan to prepare StudentM for sixth grade next year, including accepting his loss of Miss AmazingParaEducator, starting in November, allowing NINE MONTHS for him to adapt to that inevitability. The decision to remove AmazingParaEducator’s services from Stephenson doesn’t even allow for 9 DAYS, much less nine months!

Finally, I would also like to remind you that this decision does not just affect StudentM. Any attempt to make up the deficits in support currently provided by AmazingParaEducator by other staff, including the classroom teacher, reduces the time other staff has to spend with the children not on an IEP. I have a younger daughter (neurotypical) in Kindergarten. She has a classmate who has been receiving 1:1 time with Miss AmazingParaEducator. I volunteered on Tuesday and was present during writer’s workshop, a time which ordinarily Miss AmazingParaEducator would be there to aid him (she was ill today, an excellent opportunity to see the future as defined by this misguided decision). I ended up sitting with that child 1:1 during the entire worktime, and he still only managed to get 5 letters on the paper. Despite my personal familiarity with special needs children, he completed a fraction of the work with me that he manages to complete with Miss AmazingParaEducator. Had I not been there? (And I won’t be there most days; the classroom teacher doesn’t have volunteers available every hour of every day!) Either the classroom teacher would have to provide this intensive support (impossible!) instead of assisting the other 23 students (NOT acceptable as a parent of one of those 23 students!), or given the special needs child only as much assistance as any other child, in which case, that child is not receiving his IDEA protected appropriate education. I will be sharing these observations with that student’s family.

Stephenson is a small community; the 60 students in fifth grade are, for the most part, the same students that started their journey together in kindergarten.  I really do not want to be placed in the position of feeling obligated to send letters of apology to each family with student’s in my son’s class, letting them know that I am deeply sorry that the special education department’s decision has left his classroom teacher less time to work with their children since she will not only have to provide additional educational support to my son, but will have to deal with increasingly challenging and violent behaviors from my child as time passes without the full support that he needs to be successful. If you need more specific information regarding the effects on my child, and how his IEP will not be satisfied without 1:1 support, unavailable without para-educator hours in general, and Miss AmazingParaEducator para-educator hours in specific, at Stephenson, I will be more than happy to break down my son’s IEP, goal by goal, and explain the consequences to each. Again, I urge you to reconsider this decision; hopefully before Miss AmazingParaEducator is officially no longer employed at Stephenson Elementary. I do understand that budgetary concerns sometimes lead to unpleasant decisions, but I think if you examine this situation closely you will agree that it will be more expensive in the long run to deny my child the support that he needs to be successful.

Thank You, Kristen R* *email removed* *phone removed*

Not OK at the OK Corral

Things could be going more smoothly.  In the first 10 days of school, half of the have ended with my son on the floor, under his desk, weeping.  It’s any number of things — new routines, fifth grade work is more challenges, not being used to the long school day after a summer away.  He is also upset because for the first time in his K-5 history at Stephenson, he doesn’t really have a friend in the classroom.  (I use the term “friend” loosely; he doesn’t maintain relationships as a typical child.)  In Kindergarten and 2-4th he had one strong friendship (I’ll call her StudentA); they always worked together on any assignment or at any center that allowed for group work.  There has also been another student (littleMrAC) who has an incredible attitude about special needs children – he generally ignores it, and accepts it as just a difference that someone has, and attaches no stigma to it.

At the end of last year, he was feeling more comfortable and had begun to reach out a bit towards making other social relationships.  This was challenging, because StudentA did not want to let go and give my son any space.  The relationship was/is as important to her as to him.  A deliberate decision was made to separate StudentA into the other 5th grade classroom, away from my son for the 5th grade year.  I understood that it might be better for both of them.  However, they also managed to place all the other students (boys) that my son had been trying to approach in the other classroom as well, including littleMrAC.

My son feels alone and overwhelmed, and I am not convinced that he is getting enough time with AmazingParaEducator.  I’m worried about his ability to be educated right now.  If he is so overwhelmed with sensory data and emotion; he brain is simply unable to focus on other things.

An introduction to StudentM

My son is a 10 year old student in fifth grade at Stephenson Elementary in Portland Oregon.  His is on the autism spectrum, originally diagnosed with Asperger’s Syndrome and Sensory Integration Disorder.  Below is an excerpt from a letter that I sent to his teachers (our fifth grade students spend the morning with one instructor for either Language Arts or Math/Science, and then switch after lunch to the other teacher) at the beginning of the year to familiarize them a bit with my son and how his needs might manifest in his class.  He was supposed to have access to his para-educator, but she is not in the classroom 100% of the time.

I did not go into the behaviors that might be exhibited if his stressors are not managed.  AmazingaParaEducator does a remarkable job of helping him manage his mood and keep challenging, aggressive and maladaptive behaviors under control.

StudentM:  My child

AmazingParaEducator: A para-educator who has been assigned to work with my son part time (she works with other students at the same location) since second grade.  She is FABULOUS and I have to credit her for much of the skills that my son has learned in the last 3 years to better manage his behavior and receive an acceptable education.

Special Education Teacher:  Teaches students in the resource room.

“[…]

Two major “deficits” in how the ASD brain works are with executive function and theory of mind.

Executive Dysfunction. StudentM does not have the ability to easily master executive function tasks which includes skills such as organizing, planning, sequencing, sustaining attention, making mid-course corrections, keeping track of time or multiple activities at once, knowing when to seek help or additional information and inhibiting inappropriate responses.

Communication. (Theory of Mind) Typical issues with communication that you would expect to see with ASD. He will have difficulty “reading between the lines,” figurative language, understanding abstract concepts like sarcasm, or interpreting facial expressions. He has trouble explaining his behavior, and understanding how his behavior impacts how others think and feel.

This was especially obvious via the Scott Foresman reading curriculum last year. It’s focus on determining fact from fiction, generalizing, inferencing and predicting, understanding cause and effect, identifying author purpose, using context clues, determining which facts are important and drawing conclusions – those are all skills that are not strengths for an ASD student!

Unfortunately, both executive functioning and theory of mind skills are constantly needed. And the pressure to be able to perform those tasks is a stressor for him.

Eye Contact. Eye contact is difficult. The prevailing wisdom is that it should not be forced. I know that is a challenge in the classroom, as you normally seek to get individuals’ attention before beginning instruction and to recapture attention to task when students’ demeanors suggest that their attention is waning.   I have actually requested that all objectives related to requesting eye contact be removed from his IEP. IF asked to “look at me”, he is LESS likely to be paying attention to the content of the lesson, and instead being stressed by trying to read the subtle socioemotional messages relayed by the eyes. He will be counting eyelashes and watching your pupil expand and contract. He has expressed to me that it is easiest to focus on what a teacher is saying when he is doing something with his hands, using a fidget or doodling.   That then is the challenge – knowing when his slumped posture (weak core muscles) and doodling is StudentM paying attention, or if he has slipped off into his own world and is really just drawing and not paying attention.

Fine Motor Issues. StudentM does not have age level fine motor control. This shows most in speech and handwriting. In speaking, he tends to mush his words and drop syllables. He has been working with Fern for 3 years, and he has the ability to form all the sounds, but doesn’t always demonstrate it, especially if he is emotional. For oral presentations or speaking up in class, usually a reminder to speak slowly and clearly is enough, as long as he is at baseline otherwise.

Handwriting has been a major hurdle. He is unable to easily control the pencil with enough skill to form letters as he knows they are “supposed” to look (like a typewritten font). This is frustrating for him, and he will get upset and refuse to perform. In the past we have helped alleviate this issue in two ways. First, he has used me or AmazingParaEducator as a “scribe” for worksheets, math, etc. where the second solution isn’t effective. Secondly, I have provided a Surface2 for his use in school. For paragraph writing, etc., he has been using the computer and been much more successful at completing writing assignments. We will need to discuss the best way to get writing to you from his computer.

He CAN write. Given no other choice, he WILL write. But it is slow and stressful, and he often doesn’t finish an entire assignment, even a non-writing specific assignment, like morning math worksheets or whatnot, if it is writing intensive. (That’s pretty typical for Aspergers though – Asperger’s time is twice as much time, half as much done =0) His cursive writing is more legible than his manuscript, but he still defaults to manuscript when given a choice because it’s “easier”.

Sensory Integration Disorder. StudentM does not deal well with noise (understatement!). He does have access to noise reducing headphones; and will need a place to keep those. He does not always think to use them. He may need a nudge to use them if you see he is ramping up to a meltdown (once you get to know him and recognize the signs), for attending assemblies, or if the classroom is especially noisy.

He needs to use those headphones for PE. He has been resistant in the past, but they are not optional for PE. Especially in the beginning of the year, he’ll likely need to be reminded to bring them.

His IEP calls for him to have lunch in Special Education Teacher’s room with a friend or two to avoid the madness of the cafeteria.

He will not be participating in band (partially because of the noise, and partially because it’s doubtful he can handle the fingering), although he is approved to participate in choir, should we have a choir teacher this year. He should probably bring the headphones for choir as well.

The other sensory issue that you may see in the classroom – he does not like to touch anything gooey. He doesn’t like to use glue because he is likely to get it on his fingers. He may not complain about it and just do it, he may enlist someone to help him or he may sit there and refuse to participate without explaining why he doesn’t want to do it. Last year he was so freaked out by the salt dough assignment that he not only refused to touch it, but didn’t want to be in the same room with it.

He doesn’t like wearing clothes. He is NOT going to strip in class, but he generally refuses any outerwear. We have agreed that as long as it is above freezing, it is his choice. I figure that if he does get too cold, it’s a natural consequence and he’ll make a different choice the next time.

Other Issues.

In third grade, StudentM finally started facing material that he didn’t already know, or wasn’t easily understood at a glance. We discovered that he does not like to be challenged. He is smart, but when encountering new material or facing multi-step problems where the answer isn’t immediately obvious, he shuts down. “It’s Impossible!” “It’s TOO hard!” “That’s not a FAIR question” in angry tones is his typical response. He had been used to looking at a problem and just instinctively knowing the answer. At library time, he will choose books far below reading level, and needs encouragement to choose chapter books instead of picture books. I had this issue added to his IEP, and I’ve worked with him at home on this, and there was some improvement last year. I bring this up not because I expect you to give him a pass. I want you to be aware that he is very capable and I don’t want him to be excused from challenges.

Another struggle is actually showing his work for math problems. Even on multi-step problems, he wants to complete the work in his head and just give the answer. I understand that while taking the OAKS test last year he refused scratch paper to work out the steps of a problem because it was “cheating”.

StudentM’s IEP allows for “time outs” in Special Education Teacher’s room. These are not used as “punishment” but given as an opportunity for him to take a break, relax, and get back to baseline. It’s much better to catch him early when he is just agitated, rather than already melted down (he doesn’t respond to much once he gets to that point), and recommend a short break. That’ll be tough until you know him better though. Assuming AmazingParaEducator is returning, she knows him very well. He adores her and she can get him to do things that no one else can, including me. Last year I had some concerns that he was manipulating the system a bit, and requesting “needed” breaks just to get away from challenging academics rather than challenging environment, but I wasn’t able to be in the classroom enough to be sure. It’s something to keep an eye on this year.

Routine and schedule are important for StudentM. If you have a posted schedule, that will be particularly reassuring for him. He has learned to handle changes in routine much better than a few years ago, but it is still a good idea if you can give him a heads up about any deviation from what he expects from the day.

I have focused mainly on the challenges, but he is not all negative! StudentM has had a good relationship with the adults at school, and those that work with him have gone out of their way to stop me and let me know how much they enjoy him, when they could have said nothing at all. StudentM can be very caring and thoughtful (although expressing his concern and caring is not always done via a social norm).

StudentM is bright and quick to see patterns. He seems to think and solve problems via visual processing, seeing pictures in his head. Can result in novel thinking and “big picture” insights. He is an excellent reader, fluent above grade level. He reads and speaks with expression and enthusiasm. His understanding of pattern and phonics means he is an excellent speller.

His lack of social understanding means that he completely misses the nuances of cliques and social ostracism that have been developing in a number of his classmates. He non-discriminatory, non-judgmental and he likes and will work with almost anyone. The exceptions to this are students that are especially loud (ones that “shout out”) and the ones that purposely push his buttons.

StudentM operates “in the now”, and while that can be problematic at times when planning is called for, it means he is often living a more mindful life, not suffering from distractions and anxieties about the future that plague so many.

[…]